Condé Nast Outshines the Rest Despite Itself
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18c9b/18c9b28e08da664505920f5d5ec25412a0d10c6b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ac3/e2ac3e50f9fd6e2363d6a4de42af2ae9414353f8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61096/6109664bf4d2893c62b72463700626bde2785842" alt=""
But some of these titles have also had their share of recent negative PR, from the New Yorker's Obama terrorist fist bump cover, to Italian Vogue's 'Black Issue' and U.S. Vogue's LeBron James cover. Many thought the fist bump cover was insensitive in its inadvertent fanning of the prejudicial flames this political season. The Italian Vogue issue celebrated the beauty and diversity of the black form, but was seen as patronizing and too little too late for a title that historically sidelined minority models. And the over-the-top imagery of the James cover was compared to a poster of King Kong and Fay Ray. Not the best look.
From my perspective, it seems a few more faces of color in the executive/creative ranks at Condé Nast — and across the media spectrum — would go a long way to smooth out or all together avoid these types of gaffs. Nevertheless, according to the Times piece, Condé Naste seems to welcome the controversy, in any form. As always, it sells. After several weeks, I finally found a second printing of the 'Black Issue' at a NY newsstand. The first printing had completely sold out.
Comments